My personal views on research in 3 countries/continents –
Pros:
1) Open source learning, good interaction among students
2) Urge to perform, understand and good awareness
3) People with good theoretical understanding
4) Low cost methods to do high-end research – enriches creativity
Cons:
1) Time consuming, not highly focused
2) Lack of good education in experiments
3) Not many get opportunity to do research
4) Not many are interested in research – ‘software company: big buck’ attitude
Pros:
1) Desire to understand a problem in depth, significant time spent on a problem
2) Research in groups, sharing of knowledge and resources, big projects
3) Technically superior than US and
4) Emphasis on conferences and proceeding
Cons:
1) Sometimes lack of drive and urgency - 9 to 5 attitude
2) Multiple languages
3) Pro-European preferences in positions
4) Hierarchy, high taxes
Pros:
1) Magnificent drive among students and Profs
2) Group meetings – task driven meeting, deadlines etc.
3) Result oriented – ‘come what may we need to do’ attitude, thrust on applications
4) Competition – ‘do it before someone does’ attitude, if you are good, you thrive…
Cons:
1) Money, money, money – it’s a rat race for funding
2) anti open source – capitalistic view point
3) Indian and Chinese students used as cheap labor
4) ‘Black box’ attitude towards instruments
I totally agree with you! Europe lacks the drive to do things! I really didn't like their lousiness in thought and action!
ReplyDeletebut their technical knowledge is good, just that research is part of their lives, which is easy going in many ways....
ReplyDeleteWould have loved to see a comparison on the degree of plagiarism in science at these three places... since you have first hand experience at research. And would have also made your post more sensational!
ReplyDeleteplagiarism is a deeper issue...in fact a separate post may be needed to address it....having said that India may still lead over the other two players....but can't discount our big brother CHINA...
ReplyDeleteThanks for the good insight into the reality, would like to know, also what makes the researcher decide upon the next assignment, when they finish the task at hand.
ReplyDeleteThough i know you have claimed the list is not comprehensive, so like to hear about this.
@Manu - I would say, it depends on taste....for the next assignment, it is always better to move into a place where your work does not differ a lot from your Ph.D., but at the same time it should add in new knowledge...
ReplyDelete